linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:44:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217174419.GY26177@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150121150716.GD11596@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

* Peter Zijlstra | 2015-01-21 16:07:16 [+0100]:

>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:16:13PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> I'm actually wondering if we should just nuke the _interruptible()
>> version of swait. As it should only be all interruptible or all not
>> interruptible, that the swait_wake() should just do the wake up
>> regardless. In which case, swait_wake() is good enough. No need to have
>> different versions where people may think do something special.
>> 
>> Peter?
>
>Yeah, I think the lastest thing I have sitting here on my disk only has
>the swake_up() which does TASK_NORMAL, no choice there.

what is the swait status in terms of mainline? This sounds like it
beeing worked on.
I could take the series but then I would drop it again if the mainline
implementation changes…

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 17:12 [patch -rt 0/2] use simple waitqueue for kvm vcpu waitqueue (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-14 17:12 ` [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-14 18:22   ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-16 16:48   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-16 16:56     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-17  7:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-19 14:41     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-20  5:46       ` Paul Mackerras
2015-01-20 18:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-21 15:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 17:44             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-02-18 14:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 21:02                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-08-07 10:57                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-07 11:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-07 16:41                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-07 16:45                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-09  6:39                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-17 20:31                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-02-27  0:23               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-05  1:09                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-05  7:42                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-06 13:54   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-01-14 17:12 ` [patch -rt 2/2] KVM: lapic: mark LAPIC timer handler as irqsafe Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-14 18:23   ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-14 17:35 ` [patch -rt 0/2] use simple waitqueue for kvm vcpu waitqueue (v3) Paolo Bonzini
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-21 20:36 [patch -rt 0/2] use simple waitqueue for kvm vcpu waitqueue (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-21 20:36 ` [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Marcelo Tosatti
2015-04-08 23:33 [patch -rt 0/2] use simple waitqueue for kvm vcpu waitqueue (v5) Marcelo Tosatti
2015-04-08 23:33 ` [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150217174419.GY26177@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).