From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:59:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20150217175922.GC26177@linutronix.de>
References: <1421919555-11631-1-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
 <54CF44EC.3050007@freescale.com>
 <54E333C0.5000908@freescale.com>
 <20150217175317.GB26177@linutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
	Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@freescale.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150217175317.GB26177@linutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:

>* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
>
>>Ping?
>>
>>On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
>>>Ping?
>
>No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.

The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other chunk:

|+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) && defined(CONFIG_KVM_MPIC)
|+/* Limit the number of vcpus due to in-kernel mpic concurrency */
|+#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS          4
|+#define KVM_MAX_VCORES         4
|+#else
| #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS          NR_CPUS
| #define KVM_MAX_VCORES         NR_CPUS
|+#endif

should be a separate patch. Please repost including ppc ml.

This remains of my multiple-MSI patch which someone other posted a while
ago. What happend to it?

Sebatian