From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [OSADL QA 3.18.9-rt5 #1] Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:12:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20150513081236.GA21106@linutronix.de> References: <55245FC8.9090509@osadl.org> <5526AE86.7030708@linutronix.de> <20150410123634.GA3057@linutronix.de> <20150511201506.29a5c3e2@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Carsten Emde , Linux RT Users To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:59494 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933306AbbEMIMm (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 04:12:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150511201506.29a5c3e2@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Steven Rostedt | 2015-05-11 20:15:06 [-0400]: >I'm backporting this to the stable releases, and I'm a bit worried >about the above comment. The new Scheduler IPI code uses work queues and >requires it to be done in a hard irq. The IPI part is only done for the high-prio which is only used by NOHZ. Everyone else gets in via softiq as we did it before. >-- Steve Sebastian