From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henning Schild Subject: Re: [PATCH] cyclictest: remove compatibilty hack for old libnuma, repairs "-a" for isolcpus Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:11:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20150521131119.4909a2dd@md1em3qc> References: <20150427125846.1de46037@sluggy> <1432126711-18618-1-git-send-email-henning.schild@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: RT , Thomas Gleixner , "Gary S. Robertson" , Clark Williams To: John Kacur Return-path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:57919 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753328AbbEULdW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 07:33:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 20 May 2015 16:38:25 +0200 John Kacur wrote: > This is a terrible hack, but I'm afraid to remove it yet. > Even systems as recent as Fedora 19 have a libnuma less than that. > pm -qf /usr/lib64/libnuma.so > numactl-devel-2.0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > [jkacur@riemann rt-tests]$ cat /etc/fedora-release=20 > Fedora release 19 (Schr=C3=B6dinger=E2=80=99s Cat) According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases that is an old unsupported release, so i would not call it recent. No funny state inbetween, that cat is dead. As far as i can see Fedora 20+ should have 2.0.9+, which is fine. If you ask me, a compatibilty hack that brakes all modern systems is no= t acceptable. I do not know how many bits and pieces could be tuned, but automake for that one issue seems overkill. Henning -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html