From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_break_hook Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:07:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20151001150735.GH6963@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1443653944-21885-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, will.deacon@arm.com, dave.long@linaro.org, panand@redhat.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Yang Shi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443653944-21885-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c > index cebf786..eb520d0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c > @@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ static int call_break_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr) > struct break_hook *hook; > int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr) = NULL; > > - read_lock(&break_hook_lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > list_for_each_entry(hook, &break_hook, node) > if ((esr & hook->esr_mask) == hook->esr_val) > fn = hook->fn; > - read_unlock(&break_hook_lock); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > return fn ? fn(regs, esr) : DBG_HOOK_ERROR; > } That's not enough, you also need list_(add|del)_rcu where the list is modified, together with list_for_each_entry_rcu() here. -- Catalin