From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] Revert "net: use synchronize_rcu_expedited()" Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:16:08 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <20151030.181608.1502431720880609527.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20151027004422.GH5105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151027123153.GG8245@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> <1445955481.7476.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joshc@ni.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1445955481.7476.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:18:01 -0700 > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 07:31 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote: > >> Okay, yes, I like the first suggestion better as well, I've included a >> patch below that does just that. I hope you don't mind me turning it >> into a Suggested-by :). >> >> Thanks for taking a look! >> Josh > > >> @@ -6969,7 +6969,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_netdev); >> void synchronize_net(void) >> { >> might_sleep(); >> - if (rtnl_is_locked()) >> + if (rtnl_is_locked() && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)) >> synchronize_rcu_expedited(); >> else >> synchronize_rcu(); > > No objection from me. Thanks. > > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet I agree with the sentiment to do the simple thing here first before adding potentially useless knobs. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller