From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:08:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421120854.490ce681@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1604211736070.11619@riemann>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> wrote:
> From 5e5a1cb500a26b63aff8a19a2669e224c5d6e87a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:29:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available
>
> NUMA users should have long ago stepped up to libs that have
> numa_parse_cpustring_all(). Make this the default so that we can include
> isolated cpus in the affinity string.
>
> If there are any NUMA users or distros left that have old libraries that
> don't have numa_parse_cpu_string_all(), and only numa_parse_cpu_string()
> they can compile like this
>
> make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=0
>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 280fd3bec979..ff1d1b0554a3 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -57,16 +57,17 @@ ifneq ($(filter x86_64 i386 ia64 mips powerpc,$(machinetype)),)
> NUMA := 1
> endif
>
> -# The default is to assume that you only have numa_parse_cpustring
> -# If you are sure you have a version of libnuma with numa_parse_cpustring_all
> +# The default is to assume that you have numa_parse_cpustring_all
> +# If you have an older version of libnuma that only has numa_parse_cpustring
> # then compile with
> -# make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=1
> +# make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=0
> +HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL?=1
> ifeq ($(NUMA),1)
> CFLAGS += -DNUMA
> NUMA_LIBS = -lnuma
> -ifdef HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> - CFLAGS += -DHAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> -endif
> + ifeq ($(HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL),1)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> + endif
> endif
>
> include src/arch/android/Makefile
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 15:38 [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available John Kacur
2016-04-21 16:08 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421120854.490ce681@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).