From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<stable-rt@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 5/8] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:57:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160712165802.606359149@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20160712165749.741663758@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-arm-lazy-preempt-correct-resched-condition.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1193 bytes --]
3.10.102-rt113-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index 9b51e3faff52..06be94212de9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -234,7 +234,11 @@ svc_preempt:
bne 1b
tst r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
moveq pc, r8 @ go again
- b 1b
+ ldr r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY] @ get preempt lazy count
+ teq r0, #0 @ if preempt lazy count != 0
+ beq 1b
+ mov pc, r8 @ go again
+
#endif
__und_fault:
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 16:57 [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.10.102-rt113-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] kvm, rt: change async pagefault code locking for PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] net: dev: always take qdiscs busylock in __dev_xmit_skb() Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 3/8] list_bl: fixup bogus lockdep warning Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] kernel/printk: Dont try to print from IRQ/NMI region Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] trace: correct off by one while recording the trace-event Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] x86: Fix an RT MCE crash Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.10.102-rt113-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160712165802.606359149@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).