From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/3] tracing: Add NMI tracing in hwlat detector
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:52:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160805105207.16e26a41@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160805143555.GB21312@linutronix.de>
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:35:55 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt | 2016-08-04 13:16:45 [-0400]:
>
> >diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_irq.h b/include/linux/ftrace_irq.h
> >index dca7bf8cffe2..4ec2c9b205f2 100644
> >--- a/include/linux/ftrace_irq.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/ftrace_irq.h
> >@@ -3,11 +3,34 @@
> …
> >+static inline void ftrace_nmi_enter(void)
> >+{
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER
> >+ if (trace_hwlat_callback_enabled)
> >+ trace_hwlat_callback(true);
>
> so we take a tracepoint while we enter an nmi
It's not technically a tracepoint. I'm not sure tracepoints
(jumplabels) may be located this early in the NMI handler. This is
before some of the magic of having NMIs dealing with page faults and
break points.
>
> >--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> >+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> >@@ -64,6 +64,15 @@ static struct dentry *hwlat_sample_window; /* sample window us */
> > /* Save the previous tracing_thresh value */
> > static unsigned long save_tracing_thresh;
> >
> >+/* NMI timestamp counters */
> >+static u64 nmi_ts_start;
> >+static u64 nmi_total_ts;
> >+static int nmi_count;
> >+static int nmi_cpu;
>
> and this is always limited to one CPU at a time?
Yes. Hence the "nmi_cpu".
>
> …
> >@@ -125,6 +138,19 @@ static void trace_hwlat_sample(struct hwlat_sample *sample)
> > #define init_time(a, b) (a = b)
> > #define time_u64(a) a
> >
> >+void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
> >+{
> >+ if (smp_processor_id() != nmi_cpu)
> >+ return;
> >+
> >+ if (enter)
> >+ nmi_ts_start = time_get();
>
> but more interestingly: trace_clock_local() -> sched_clock()
> and of kernel/time/sched_clock.c we do raw_read_seqcount(&cd.seq) which
> means we are busted if the NMI triggers during update_clock_read_data().
Hmm, interesting. Because this is true for general tracing from an NMI.
/me looks at code.
Ah, this is when we have GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK, which would break tracing
if any arch that has this also has NMIs. Probably need to look at arm64.
For x86, it has its own NMI safe sched_clock. I could make this "NMI"
code depend on:
#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
-- Steve
>
> >+ else {
> >+ nmi_total_ts = time_get() - nmi_ts_start;
> >+ nmi_count++;
> >+ }
> >+}
>
> Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 14:57 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] tracing: Add Hardware Latency detector tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-04 14:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Added hardware latency tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-05 14:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-08-05 14:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-05 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-08-05 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-04 14:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] tracing: Add documentation for hwlat_detector tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 14:12 ` Jon Masters
2016-08-04 14:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] tracing: Have hwlat trace migrate across tracing_cpumask CPUs Steven Rostedt
2016-08-04 15:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] tracing: Add Hardware Latency detector tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-09 18:15 ` Clark Williams
2016-08-09 18:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-04 16:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/3] tracing: Add NMI tracing in hwlat detector Steven Rostedt
2016-08-04 17:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-05 14:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-08-05 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-08-05 15:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-08-05 16:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-09 17:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 14:10 ` Jon Masters
2016-08-09 18:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/3] tracing: Add smi counting to HWLAT Steven Rostedt
2016-08-09 18:28 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2016-08-09 18:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-09 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160805105207.16e26a41@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).