From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<stable-rt@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 07/10] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:49:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923024938.899692200@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20160923024927.685936218@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0007-fs-dcache-resched-chill-only-if-we-make-no-progress.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2305 bytes --]
3.14.79-rt85-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Upstream commit 47be61845c77 ("fs/dcache.c: avoid soft-lockup in
dput()") changed the condition _when_ cpu_relax() / cond_resched() was
invoked. This change was adapted in -RT into mostly the same thing
except that if cond_resched() did nothing we had to do cpu_chill() to
force the task off CPU for a tiny little bit in case the task had RT
priority and did not want to leave the CPU.
This change resulted in a performance regression (in my testcase the
build time on /dev/shm increased from 19min to 24min). The reason is
that with this change cpu_chill() was invoked even dput() made progress
(dentry_kill() returned a different dentry) instead only if we were
trying this operation on the same dentry over and over again.
This patch brings back to the old behavior back to cond_resched() &
chill if we make no progress. A little improvement is to invoke
cpu_chill() only if we are a RT task (and avoid the sleep otherwise).
Otherwise the scheduler should remove us from the CPU if we make no
progress.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
fs/dcache.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 2c37cbad09d8..4935dbe31d65 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
#include <linux/prefetch.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <linux/list_lru.h>
+#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
+#include <linux/sched/deadline.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include "mount.h"
@@ -589,6 +591,8 @@ again:
*/
void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
{
+ struct dentry *parent;
+
if (unlikely(!dentry))
return;
@@ -617,9 +621,19 @@ repeat:
return;
kill_it:
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
- if (dentry)
+ parent = dentry_kill(dentry);
+ if (parent) {
+ int r;
+
+ if (parent == dentry) {
+ /* the task with the highest priority won't schedule */
+ r = cond_resched();
+ if (!r && (rt_task(current) || dl_task(current)))
+ cpu_chill();
+ } else
+ dentry = parent;
goto repeat;
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dput);
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 2:49 [PATCH RT 00/10] Linux 3.14.79-rt85-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 01/10] timers: wakeup all timer waiters Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 02/10] timers: wakeup all timer waiters without holding the base lock Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 03/10] sched: lazy_preempt: avoid a warning in the !RT case Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 04/10] scsi/fcoe: Fix get_cpu()/put_cpu_light() imbalance in fcoe_recv_frame() Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 05/10] net: add back the missing serialization in ip_send_unicast_reply() Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 08/10] x86/preempt-lazy: fixup should_resched() Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 09/10] fs/dcache: incremental fixup of the retry routine Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23 2:49 ` [PATCH RT 10/10] Linux 3.14.79-rt85-rc1 Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-22 23:17 [PATCH RT 00/10] Linux 3.18.42-rt45-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-09-22 23:17 ` [PATCH RT 07/10] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress Steven Rostedt
2016-09-22 21:57 [PATCH RT 00/10] Linux 4.1.33-rt38-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-09-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RT 07/10] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress Steven Rostedt
2016-09-22 21:47 [PATCH RT 00/10] Linux 4.4.21-rt31-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-09-22 21:47 ` [PATCH RT 07/10] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160923024938.899692200@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).