From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: RT_RUNTIME_GREED sched feature
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:07:40 -0500
Message-ID: <20161108090740.4226ffc9@gandalf.local.home>
References: <fa5b1b55d8934c6a0e02e04a7ad6afdf4012c2e0.1478506194.git.bristot@redhat.com>
        <20161108115958.GO3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161108115958.GO3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:59:58 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> No, none of this stands a chance of being accepted.
> 
> This is making bad code worse.

Peter,

Instead of a flat out rejection, can you please provide some
constructive criticism to let those that are working on this know what
would be accepted? And what their next steps should be.

There's obviously a problem with the current code, what steps do you
recommend to fix it?

-- Steve