From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linux RT Users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
cmetcalf@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] MM: allow per-cpu vmstat_threshold and vmstat_worker configuration
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 16:09:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170526190926.GA8974@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705252220130.7596@east.gentwo.org>
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:24:46PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > Argument? We're showing you the data that this is causing a latency
> > problem for us.
>
> Sorry I am not sure where the data shows a latency problem. There are
> interrupts and scheduler ticks. But what does this have to do with vmstat?
>
> Show me your dpdk code running and trace the tick on / off events as well
> as the vmstat invocations. Also show all system calls occurring on the cpu
> that runs dpdk. That is necessary to see what triggers vmstat and how the
> system reacts to the changes to the differentials.
Sure, i can get that to you. The question remains: Are you arguing
its not valid for a realtime application to use any system call
which changes a vmstat counter?
Because if they are allowed, then its obvious something like
this is needed.
> Then please rerun the test by setting the vmstat_interval to 60.
>
> Do another run with your modifications and show the difference.
Will do so.
> > > Something that crossed my mind was to add a new tunable to set
> > > the vmstat_interval for each CPU, this way we could essentially
> > > disable it to the CPUs where DPDK is running. What's the implications
> > > of doing this besides not getting up to date stats in /proc/vmstat
> > > (which I still have to confirm would be OK)? Can this break anything
> > > in the kernel for example?
> >
> > Well, you get incorrect statistics.
>
> The statistics are never completely accurate. You will get less accurate
> statistics but they will be correct. The differentials may not be
> reflected in the counts shown via /proc but there is a cap on how
> inaccurate those can becore.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-26 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-25 13:57 [patch 0/2] per-CPU vmstat thresholds and vmstat worker disablement Marcelo Tosatti
2017-04-25 13:57 ` [patch 1/2] MM: remove unused quiet_vmstat function Marcelo Tosatti
2017-04-25 13:57 ` [patch 2/2] MM: allow per-cpu vmstat_threshold and vmstat_worker configuration Marcelo Tosatti
2017-04-25 19:29 ` Rik van Riel
2017-04-25 19:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-02 14:28 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-05-02 16:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-02 17:15 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-05-02 17:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-11 15:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-12 12:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-12 15:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-12 16:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-12 16:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-15 19:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-16 13:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-19 14:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-19 17:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-19 17:49 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-05-22 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-25 19:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-26 3:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-26 19:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2017-05-30 18:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-07-10 15:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-20 8:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-22 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-22 21:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170526190926.GA8974@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).