From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:41:31 -0400
Message-ID: <20170619104131.05fdc76f@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20170616105610.rbc6itylcrsla56l@linutronix.de>
        <1497687277.6908.31.camel@gmx.de>
        <20170619085206.n2n22lpdfsoqbp5m@linutronix.de>
        <1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de>
        <20170619100838.343faaee@gandalf.local.home>
        <20170619141341.m243ivutmwlzyhc4@linutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170619141341.m243ivutmwlzyhc4@linutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:13:41 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:


> > Hmm, it shouldn't affect futexes, as it's only called by rtmutex when
> > waiter->savestate is true. And that should always be false for futex.  
> 
> you still have sleeping locks like the hb-lock (which might matter in
> case the task blocks on the lock and does not continue for some reason).

But then I'd expect this to be an issue with any spinlock in the kernel.

-- Steve