From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@siemens.com>,
tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com, Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>,
stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, Oleg.Karfich@wago.com
Subject: [PATCH RT 2/4] fs/dcache: disable preemption on i_dir_seqs write side
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:04:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121160517.340822152@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20171121160442.866038796@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-fs-dcache-disable-preemption-on-i_dir_seq-s-write-si.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4228 bytes --]
4.9.61-rt52-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
i_dir_seq is an opencoded seqcounter. Based on the code it looks like we
could have two writers in parallel despite the fact that the d_lock is
held. The problem is that during the write process on RT the preemption
is still enabled and if this process is interrupted by a reader with RT
priority then we lock up.
To avoid that lock up I am disabling the preemption during the update.
The rename of i_dir_seq is here to ensure to catch new write sides in
future.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Oleg.Karfich@wago.com
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
fs/dcache.c | 12 +++++++-----
fs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/libfs.c | 6 ++++--
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 37948da28742..f0719b2f1be5 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2409,9 +2409,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir)
{
+ preempt_disable_rt();
for (;;) {
- unsigned n = dir->i_dir_seq;
- if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
+ unsigned n = dir->__i_dir_seq;
+ if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
return n;
cpu_relax();
}
@@ -2419,7 +2420,8 @@ static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir)
static inline void end_dir_add(struct inode *dir, unsigned n)
{
- smp_store_release(&dir->i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+ smp_store_release(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+ preempt_enable_rt();
}
static void d_wait_lookup(struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -2455,7 +2457,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct dentry *parent,
retry:
rcu_read_lock();
- seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq) & ~1;
+ seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq) & ~1;
r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
dentry = __d_lookup_rcu(parent, name, &d_seq);
if (unlikely(dentry)) {
@@ -2477,7 +2479,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct dentry *parent,
goto retry;
}
hlist_bl_lock(b);
- if (unlikely(parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq != seq)) {
+ if (unlikely(parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq != seq)) {
hlist_bl_unlock(b);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto retry;
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 920aa0b1c6b0..3d6b5fd1bf06 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode)
inode->i_bdev = NULL;
inode->i_cdev = NULL;
inode->i_link = NULL;
- inode->i_dir_seq = 0;
+ inode->__i_dir_seq = 0;
inode->i_rdev = 0;
inode->dirtied_when = 0;
diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 48826d4da189..3ea54d1fc431 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct dentry *next_positive(struct dentry *parent,
struct list_head *from,
int count)
{
- unsigned *seq = &parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq, n;
+ unsigned *seq = &parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq, n;
struct dentry *res;
struct list_head *p;
bool skipped;
@@ -122,8 +122,9 @@ static struct dentry *next_positive(struct dentry *parent,
static void move_cursor(struct dentry *cursor, struct list_head *after)
{
struct dentry *parent = cursor->d_parent;
- unsigned n, *seq = &parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq;
+ unsigned n, *seq = &parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq;
spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
+ preempt_disable_rt();
for (;;) {
n = *seq;
if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(seq, n, n + 1) == n)
@@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ static void move_cursor(struct dentry *cursor, struct list_head *after)
else
list_add_tail(&cursor->d_child, &parent->d_subdirs);
smp_store_release(seq, n + 2);
+ preempt_enable_rt();
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index d705ae084edd..ab1946f4a729 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ struct inode {
struct block_device *i_bdev;
struct cdev *i_cdev;
char *i_link;
- unsigned i_dir_seq;
+ unsigned __i_dir_seq;
};
__u32 i_generation;
--
2.13.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 16:04 [PATCH RT 0/4] Linux 4.9.61-rt52-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2017-11-21 16:04 ` [PATCH RT 1/4] drivers/zram: fix zcomp_stream_get() smp_processor_id() use in preemptible code Steven Rostedt
2017-11-21 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-11-21 16:04 ` [PATCH RT 3/4] tpm_tis: fix stall after iowrite*()s Steven Rostedt
2017-11-21 16:04 ` [PATCH RT 4/4] Linux 4.9.61-rt52-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171121160517.340822152@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=Oleg.Karfich@wago.com \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.wagner@siemens.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).