From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] crypto: arm64 - disable NEON across scatterwalk API calls Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20171202090107.GT3326@worktop> References: <20171201211927.24653-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Rutland , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Catalin Marinas , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , Steven Rostedt , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Dave Martin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Ard Biesheuvel Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171201211927.24653-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Note that the remaining crypto drivers simply operate on fixed buffers, so > while the RT crowd may still feel the need to disable those (and the ones > below as well, perhaps), they don't call back into the crypto layer like > the ones updated by this series, and so there's no room for improvement > there AFAICT. Do these other drivers process all the blocks fed to them in one go under a single NEON section, or do they do a single fixed block per NEON invocation?