From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Mardorf Subject: Re: RT patchset naming convention Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20171230061848.1918cd85@archlinux.localdomain> References: <20171230060728.398d1845@archlinux.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail232c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.242]:51220 "EHLO mail37c50.megamailservers.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750731AbdL3FSt (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Dec 2017 00:18:49 -0500 Received: from archlinux.localdomain (x4e3215f7.dyn.telefonica.de [78.50.21.247]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail37c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id vBU5IjaQ012514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 05:18:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20171230060728.398d1845@archlinux.localdomain> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.9.61-rt61 4.9.68-rt60 It's somewhat unusual that the kernel version does increases and the rt patch version decreases, usually it's vice versa ;). 4.14.6-rt7 4.14.8-rt9