linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
	claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	alessio.balsini@gmail.com, bristot@redhat.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
	henrik@austad.us, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFD/RFC PATCH 3/8] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on
Date: Tue,  9 Oct 2018 11:24:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181009092434.26221-4-juri.lelli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181009092434.26221-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Track the blocked-on relation for mutexes, this allows following this
relation at schedule time. Add blocked_task to track the inverse
relation.

                ,-> task
                |     | blocked-on
                |     v
   blocked-task |   mutex
                |     | owner
                |     v
                `-- task

This patch only enables blocked-on relation, blocked-task will be
enabled in a later patch implementing proxy().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[minor changes while rebasing]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h        | 6 ++----
 kernel/fork.c                | 6 +++---
 kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 7 +++----
 kernel/locking/mutex.c       | 3 +++
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 977cb57d7bc9..a35e8ab3eef1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -907,10 +907,8 @@ struct task_struct {
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter		*pi_blocked_on;
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
-	/* Mutex deadlock detection: */
-	struct mutex_waiter		*blocked_on;
-#endif
+	struct task_struct 	*blocked_task;	/* task that's boosting us */
+	struct mutex 		*blocked_on;	/* lock we're blocked on */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	unsigned int			irq_events;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f0b58479534f..ef27a675b0d7 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1827,9 +1827,9 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	lockdep_init_task(p);
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
-	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
-#endif
+	p->blocked_task = NULL; /* nobody is boosting us yet*/
+	p->blocked_on = NULL;  /* not blocked yet */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
 	p->sequential_io	= 0;
 	p->sequential_io_avg	= 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index a660d38b6c29..6605e083a3e9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
 {
 	SMP_DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!raw_spin_is_locked(&lock->wait_lock));
 
-	/* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
-	task->blocked_on = waiter;
+	/* Current thread can't be alredy blocked (since it's executing!) */
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on);
 }
 
 void mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
@@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ void mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
 {
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(list_empty(&waiter->list));
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(waiter->task != task);
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on != waiter);
-	task->blocked_on = NULL;
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on != lock);
 
 	list_del_init(&waiter->list);
 	waiter->task = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index f37402cd8496..76b59b555da3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -979,6 +979,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 	}
 
 	waiter.task = current;
+	current->blocked_on = lock;
 
 	set_current_state(state);
 	for (;;) {
@@ -1047,6 +1048,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 	}
 
 	mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current);
+	current->blocked_on = NULL;
+
 	if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list)))
 		__mutex_clear_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAGS);
 
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-09  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-09  9:24 [RFD/RFC PATCH 0/8] Towards implementing proxy execution Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 1/8] locking/mutex: Convert mutex::wait_lock to raw_spinlock_t Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 2/8] locking/mutex: Removes wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2018-10-10 10:43   ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 3/8] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on luca abeni
2018-10-10 11:06     ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 4/8] sched: Split scheduler execution context Juri Lelli
2019-05-06 11:06   ` Claudio Scordino
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: Add proxy execution Juri Lelli
2018-10-10 11:10   ` luca abeni
2018-10-11 12:34     ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-11 12:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-11 13:42         ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-12  7:22         ` luca abeni
2018-10-12  8:30           ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 6/8] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 7/8] sched: Ensure blocked_on is always guarded by blocked_lock Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:24 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: Fixup task CPUs for potential proxies Juri Lelli
2018-10-09  9:44 ` [RFD/RFC PATCH 0/8] Towards implementing proxy execution Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-09  9:58   ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-09 10:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-09 11:56   ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-10-09 12:35     ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-10 10:34 ` luca abeni
2018-10-10 10:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-10 11:16     ` luca abeni
2018-10-10 11:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-10 12:27         ` Juri Lelli
2018-10-10 11:56 ` Henrik Austad
2018-10-10 12:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-10 13:48     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-10-10 12:36   ` Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181009092434.26221-4-juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=alessio.balsini@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=henrik@austad.us \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).