public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v6.3-rc2-rt3
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:08:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230418150828.tNv46UyK@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c49c2984-10a3-de8e-c12b-9a3833270a11@suse.cz>

On 2023-04-14 17:38:56 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> What I meant that in the linked thread a solution seems to be forming in the
> form of annotation for lockdep/CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING to make it
> aware that on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT the problem it sees is side-stepped so it
> shouldn't warn about it on !PREEMPT_RT, and maybe that solution could be
> used for the printk issue as well (I admit I didn't check the code, just by
> reading your mail it sounded very similar).

Yes, you right and it would work and I would include it. Once the
DEBUG_OBJECT part is merged (the LD_LOCK_WAIT logic is missing) I would
add something here.

Sebastian

      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230314170502.OHw1_FK3@linutronix.de>
2023-03-14 17:12 ` [ANNOUNCE] v6.3-rc2-rt3 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-04-14 11:55   ` Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14 13:49     ` John Ogness
2023-04-14 13:56       ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-14 15:01         ` John Ogness
2023-04-14 15:38           ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-18 15:08             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230418150828.tNv46UyK@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox