From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:53:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240708135310.3VRFnmk1@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240527142557.321610-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On 2024-05-27 16:25:50 [+0200], Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Updates in v2:
> - Rebased and fixed a small issue in genpd, see patch3.
> - Re-tested on v6.9-rt5 (PREEMPT_RT enabled)
> - Re-tested on v6.10-rc1 (for regressions, PREEMPT_RT disabled)
>
> The hierarchical PM domain topology and the corresponding domain-idle-states
> are currently disabled on a PREEMPT_RT based configuration. The main reason is
> because spinlocks are turned into sleepable locks on PREEMPT_RT, which means
> genpd and runtime PM can't be use in the atomic idle-path when
> selecting/entering an idle-state.
>
> For s2idle/s2ram this is an unnecessary limitation that this series intends to
> address. Note that, the support for cpuhotplug is left to future improvements.
> More information about this are available in the commit messages.
I looked at it and it seems limited to pmdomain/core.c, also I don't
know if there is a ->set_performance_state callback set since the one I
checked have mutex_t locking ;)
So if this is needed, then be it. s2ram wouldn't be used in "production"
but in "safe state" so I wouldn't worry too much about latency spikes.
Not sure what it means for the other modes.
I am not to worried for now, please don't let spread more than needed ;)
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-08 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 14:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains " Ulf Hansson
2024-05-28 19:55 ` Nikunj Kela
2024-05-30 8:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-05-30 14:23 ` Nikunj Kela
2024-06-03 13:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-06-04 17:22 ` Nikunj Kela
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] pmdomain: core: Don't hold the genpd-lock when calling dev_pm_domain_set() Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs Ulf Hansson
2024-08-20 8:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-20 8:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-08-30 15:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-02 14:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-03 10:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] cpuidle: psci-domain: Enable system-wide suspend on PREEMPT_RT Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] cpuidle: psci: Drop redundant assignment of CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] cpuidle: psci: Enable the hierarchical topology for s2ram on PREEMPT_RT Ulf Hansson
2024-05-27 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cpuidle: psci: Enable the hierarchical topology for s2idle " Ulf Hansson
2024-07-08 13:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-07-09 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram " Ulf Hansson
2024-07-31 8:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-25 10:32 ` Raghavendra Kakarla
2024-08-05 11:35 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240708135310.3VRFnmk1@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mkshah@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox