[ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1

[ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Dear RT folks!

I'm pleased to announce the v6.13-rc1-rt1 patch set. 

Changes since v6.12-rc4-rt6

  - Update to 6.13-rc1

  - Down to 24 patches (including three new). The v6.12-rc4-rt6 release
    had 42.

Known issues
    None.

You can get this release via the git tree at:

    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git v6.13-rc1-rt1

The RT patch against v6.13-rc1 can be found here:

    https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.13/older/patch-6.13-rc1-rt1.patch.xz

The split quilt queue is available at:

    https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.13/older/patches-6.13-rc1-rt1.tar.xz

Sebastian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1

[Petr Tesarik]

Hi Sebastian,

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:47:01 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Dear RT folks!
> 
> I'm pleased to announce the v6.13-rc1-rt1 patch set. 
> 
> Changes since v6.12-rc4-rt6
> 
>   - Update to 6.13-rc1
> 
>   - Down to 24 patches (including three new). The v6.12-rc4-rt6 release
>     had 42.

Great job!

However, I found 26 patches in v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:

petr@mordecai:~/src/linux>  git ls-tree v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:patches | grep '\.patch$' | wc -l
26

It turns out, that these two patch files are orphaned (not listed in
series):
- netfilter-nft_counter-Use-u64_stats_t-for-statistic.patch
- riscv-add-PREEMPT_AUTO-support.patch

What is the reason to keep them around? Is it even intentional?

Petr T

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2024-12-16 16:52:48 [+0100], Petr Tesarik wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi,

> 
> However, I found 26 patches in v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:
> 
> petr@mordecai:~/src/linux>  git ls-tree v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:patches | grep '\.patch$' | wc -l
> 26
> 
> It turns out, that these two patch files are orphaned (not listed in
> series):
> - netfilter-nft_counter-Use-u64_stats_t-for-statistic.patch
> - riscv-add-PREEMPT_AUTO-support.patch
> 
> What is the reason to keep them around? Is it even intentional?

Nope. I forgot to delete them after I removed them from the series file.
Both were applied upstream. I just dropped them from the recent -rt3
release. Thanks for the note.

> Petr T

Sebastian