From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AC6216616; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736423073; cv=none; b=sVeaEXDLaPNlHZFO2vXWABap7PBaFXG4ccbylZ41lMRAr8Of9aDPeAc02BW9ptdiNrzGfwBJ9wtzJMdqUF/CAR8lEy5RCKCyHMkuntHOt/a6aEkGQQ8ZRZVQKhaloITY1tykyuDWtUs8Sa/L96dGhSvZBl8FDH5crer8Xd525jc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736423073; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mLSHUI0ViczE2xMAjdJL5WFGByH/x09LMT89EA6MTb0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dGpNZxuOITVnVx/YETXsITSu2R0lLwwD1Qyk31/wj1RFdOKg0NZz5SD0v/INH6KwbW0X+cGvq2ZtN5oH6W5sB0FoxXbsQovInpI8bC7Ip18abrIrMUz2KhlENvtQS4CV+V9zsIObY88KnBKkfsH3CStB9KcLFVSuF4UYUJMG6Mk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=cGJRf0I9; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=np9tvODk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="cGJRf0I9"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="np9tvODk" Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:44:28 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1736423069; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=szejLwXs9dyyogBjEt0/Lz89CjzS37So6iqwH5y3aSg=; b=cGJRf0I98bPrbR0WLlCeDiOuGFRO8fGGVHq3oE1d+9UtSDSMRsJgWDSf2GQi3+ooslAI22 jk+nWP9ssl7LgS72I34cPsNyxDvs/OcwYsATyf0f6Rwych4P8uqBv8jUhbmPSQPLOzo0fX oobELfbOypLTn1CKNffUM8wTgV5mcKEOHwaJW1OJVQ55jEw7PmjCdnumbZnxlPvCvmY1k8 I8y113a5JjuL3WJlP7px/Nf1le5fK+QcToWD192tmaAp3rek1kqE0mN/IjJINzQpq5Wzov xNfwYjIMwhnTEIItSCZglvAclw10z5r8HC+ZKMB9BtSL04cPYQmu6wPwTpc58A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1736423069; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=szejLwXs9dyyogBjEt0/Lz89CjzS37So6iqwH5y3aSg=; b=np9tvODkCZCV5cBMBC+MoanzKgRmS02bB/zB2FK+g6FtuDCnKNLW9lcU5ITgwIIsz9b0un gEFx3Je0xAGmcpAQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Robert Joslyn Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" , Shrikanth Hegde Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] powerpc: Allow scheduling of IRQ with PREEMPT_RT Message-ID: <20250109114428.4fvi0KRC@linutronix.de> References: <20241226191238.2559880-1-robert_joslyn@selinc.com> <20250107115606.q67--i0f@linutronix.de> <20250107115832.jLUSKKwG@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2025-01-07 18:09:46 [+0000], Robert Joslyn wrote: > > Yes, I'm using 6.6.58-rt45 at the moment. We found this regression > while trying to update from 5.10-rt. I haven't played with > lazy-preempt yet but I can certainly test the patches, presently we > run everything with PREEMPT_RT. So I released v6.12.8-rt8 and v6.13-rc6-rt3. Looking at the lazy bits I think I just forward your patch to the stable queue for v6.6. > Thanks, > Robert Sebastian