From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Jillian Donahue <jilliandonahue58@gmail.com>
Cc: "Petr Tesařík" <petesarik@suse.de>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Spinlock in f_midi_transmit causing kernel crash
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250130075026.RVen6mGf@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAArt=Lj5byHfx7SJXzHiB0ecFDWjhjODyM05=5y27PYj8bGaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-01-29 14:59:19 [-0700], Jillian Donahue wrote:
> > So a simple "tasklet_hi_schedule(&midi->tasklet);" instead of "f_midi_transmit(midi)" in f_midi_complete() might do the trick.
>
> This fixes the problem - do you have any insight to how this worked in
> the first place? Trying to understand the change.
There are possibilities. The problem is that you send a packet and it
completes the same moment and the completion callback is invoked which
deadlocks.
Now:
- PREEMPT_RT may have moved the timing a bit (makes it behave a bit
different or simply make a UP device behave like a SMP one) to the
point that it sees the completion of the request where it did not
before. So does it occur without PREEMPT_RT?
- It never did work in this combination even without PREEMPT_RT. The
driver (f_midi) was never tested with the USB device controller you
have and the one it was tested with behaves differently so the
recursion never occurred.
- It is an old driver (f_midi). It was never tested on SMP or with
enabled lock testing. On UP spinlocks end up almost as NOPs so a
deadlock (as in this case) will not be observed.
Either way I would blame f_midi here.
Once you have the pieces together, mind sending a patch?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 4:05 Spinlock in f_midi_transmit causing kernel crash Jillian Donahue
2025-01-23 13:23 ` Petr Tesařík
2025-01-24 22:21 ` Jillian Donahue
2025-01-29 10:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-01-29 21:59 ` Jillian Donahue
2025-01-30 7:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-01-31 19:08 ` Jillian Donahue
2025-02-03 12:45 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-02-03 13:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 17:50 ` Jillian Donahue
2025-02-06 12:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 18:13 ` Jillian Donahue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250130075026.RVen6mGf@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jilliandonahue58@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petesarik@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox