From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:21:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711122123.qXVK-EkF@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a50fd8af9d21aade901fe4d32e14e698378c82f.camel@xry111.site>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:09:12PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 11:58 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 05:48:56PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > Sadly, still no luck.
> >
> > That's unfortunate.
> >
> > I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, so all I can do is staring at the
> > code and guessing. But I'm out of idea for now.
>
> Same as I. I tried to reproduce in a VM running Fedora Rawhide but
> failed.
>
> > This one is going to be hard to figure out..
>
> And I'm afraid this may be a bug in my userspace...
Yeah I expect the same thing. In the log you sent me, there are some
strange-looking event masks that look like a userspace bug.
I tried those strange looking event masks, but epoll_ctl() correctly
rejects them with EINVAL. So those masks probably aren't the reason, but
they still suggest that userspace may also be broken somewhere else and
triggers hard-to-reproduce problems in kernel's epoll.
> Then I'd feel guilty if this is reverted because of an invalid bug report
> from I :(.
But even when userspace is broken, if the kernel patch makes userspace
non-functional, I would still call it a kernel bug. So it's a valid bug
report alright, don't worry about it.
Until we know exactly the root cause, I think revert is the right thing to
do.
Best regards,
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 9:08 [PATCH v3] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem Nam Cao
2025-05-30 5:08 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-25 15:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-26 13:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-26 13:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 15:27 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-25 15:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 15:57 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-25 16:02 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-26 15:23 ` John Ogness
2025-06-26 15:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-26 15:56 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-30 15:08 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-01 20:33 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-07-01 12:03 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-10 3:08 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 3:48 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 4:06 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 4:10 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 6:21 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 6:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 8:32 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 9:47 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 5:02 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-11 9:44 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-11 9:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 9:58 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-11 12:09 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 12:21 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2025-07-12 0:09 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-12 8:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 9:50 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-14 8:59 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-14 10:14 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-15 9:37 ` Yann Ylavic
2025-07-15 10:08 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-14 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250711122123.qXVK-EkF@linutronix.de \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).