public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ionut Nechita (Wind River)" <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	ming.lei@redhat.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	mkhalfella@purestorage.com, chris.friesen@windriver.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	ionut_n2001@yahoo.com, sunlightlinux@gmail.com,
	"Ionut Nechita (Wind River)" <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] block/blk-mq: use atomic_t for quiesce_depth to avoid lock contention on RT
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2026 09:37:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260303073744.20585-2-ionut.nechita@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303073744.20585-1-ionut.nechita@windriver.com>

In RT kernel (PREEMPT_RT), commit 6bda857bcbb86 ("block: fix ordering
between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding") causes severe
performance regression on systems with multiple MSI-X interrupt
vectors.

The above change introduced spinlock_t queue_lock usage in
blk_mq_run_hw_queue() to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED checks
with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(). While this works correctly in
standard kernel, it causes catastrophic serialization in RT kernel
where spinlock_t converts to sleeping rt_mutex.

Problem in RT kernel:
- blk_mq_run_hw_queue() is called from IRQ thread context
- With multiple MSI-X vectors, all IRQ threads contend on
  the same queue_lock
- queue_lock becomes rt_mutex (sleeping) in RT kernel
- IRQ threads serialize and enter D-state waiting for lock
- Throughput drops from 640 MB/s to 153 MB/s

Solution:
Convert quiesce_depth to atomic_t and use it directly for quiesce
state checking, eliminating QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED entirely. This
removes the need for any locking in the hot path.

The atomic counter serves as both the depth tracker and the quiesce
indicator (depth > 0 means quiesced). This eliminates the race
window that existed between updating the depth and the flag.

Memory ordering is ensured by:
- smp_mb__after_atomic() after modifying quiesce_depth
- smp_rmb() before re-checking quiesce state in
  blk_mq_run_hw_queue()

Performance impact:
- RT kernel: eliminates lock contention, restores full throughput
- Non-RT kernel: atomic ops are similar cost to the previous
  spinlock acquire/release, no regression expected

Test results on RT kernel:
Hardware: Broadcom/LSI MegaRAID 12GSAS/PCIe Secure SAS39xx
  (megaraid_sas driver, 128 MSI-X vectors, 120 hw queues)
- Before: 153 MB/s, IRQ threads in D-state
- After:  640 MB/s, no IRQ threads blocked

Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 6bda857bcbb86 ("block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c       |  1 +
 block/blk-mq-debugfs.c |  1 -
 block/blk-mq.c         | 45 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  9 ++++++---
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 474700ffaa1c..b6104c672547 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(struct queue_limits *lim, int node_id)
 	mutex_init(&q->limits_lock);
 	mutex_init(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
 	spin_lock_init(&q->queue_lock);
+	atomic_set(&q->quiesce_depth, 0);
 
 	init_waitqueue_head(&q->mq_freeze_wq);
 	mutex_init(&q->mq_freeze_lock);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
index 047ec887456b..1b0aec3036e6 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ static const char *const blk_queue_flag_name[] = {
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(INIT_DONE),
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(STATS),
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(REGISTERED),
-	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(QUIESCED),
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(RQ_ALLOC_TIME),
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(HCTX_ACTIVE),
 	QUEUE_FLAG_NAME(SQ_SCHED),
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9af8c3dec3f6..8bfad5272d6b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -260,12 +260,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unfreeze_queue_non_owner);
  */
 void blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
-	if (!q->quiesce_depth++)
-		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	atomic_inc(&q->quiesce_depth);
+	/*
+	 * Ensure the store to quiesce_depth is visible before any
+	 * subsequent loads in blk_mq_run_hw_queue().
+	 */
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait);
 
@@ -314,21 +314,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue);
  */
 void blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-	bool run_queue = false;
+	int depth;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(q->quiesce_depth <= 0)) {
-		;
-	} else if (!--q->quiesce_depth) {
-		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
-		run_queue = true;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	depth = atomic_dec_if_positive(&q->quiesce_depth);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(depth < 0))
+		return;
 
-	/* dispatch requests which are inserted during quiescing */
-	if (run_queue)
+	if (depth == 0) {
+		/* Ensure the decrement is visible before running queues */
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();
+		/* dispatch requests which are inserted during quiescing */
 		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unquiesce_queue);
 
@@ -2362,17 +2359,9 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
 
 	need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx);
 	if (!need_run) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		/*
-		 * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check
-		 * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use
-		 * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to
-		 * not miss rerunning the hw queue.
-		 */
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags);
+		/* Pairs with smp_mb__after_atomic() in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() */
+		smp_rmb();
 		need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags);
 
 		if (!need_run)
 			return;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index ef6457487d23..e27a437f2a77 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -520,7 +520,8 @@ struct request_queue {
 
 	spinlock_t		queue_lock;
 
-	int			quiesce_depth;
+	/* Atomic quiesce depth - also serves as quiesced indicator (depth > 0) */
+	atomic_t		quiesce_depth;
 
 	struct gendisk		*disk;
 
@@ -665,7 +666,6 @@ enum {
 	QUEUE_FLAG_INIT_DONE,		/* queue is initialized */
 	QUEUE_FLAG_STATS,		/* track IO start and completion times */
 	QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED,		/* queue has been registered to a disk */
-	QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED,		/* queue has been quiesced */
 	QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME,	/* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
 	QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE,		/* at least one blk-mq hctx is active */
 	QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED,		/* single queue style io dispatch */
@@ -703,7 +703,10 @@ void blk_queue_flag_clear(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
 #define blk_noretry_request(rq) \
 	((rq)->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV|REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT| \
 			     REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER))
-#define blk_queue_quiesced(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, &(q)->queue_flags)
+static inline bool blk_queue_quiesced(struct request_queue *q)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&q->quiesce_depth) > 0;
+}
 #define blk_queue_pm_only(q)	atomic_read(&(q)->pm_only)
 #define blk_queue_registered(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_sq_sched(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, &(q)->queue_flags)
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-03  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-03  7:37 [PATCH v5 0/1] block/blk-mq: use atomic_t for quiesce_depth to avoid lock contention on RT Ionut Nechita (Wind River)
2026-03-03  7:37 ` Ionut Nechita (Wind River) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260303073744.20585-2-ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
    --to=ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=ionut_n2001@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunlightlinux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox