From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: PEBTAO [ was Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17 ] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:26:44 -0400 Message-ID: <34162.1318033604@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1318033604_9306P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steven Rostedt , LKML , linux-rt-users To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:41483 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754756Ab1JHA12 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:27:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:14:11 +0200." Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --==_Exmh_1318033604_9306P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:14:11 +0200, Thomas Gleixner said: > If it would be only the "Sent from my .* phone" mails, it would be > easy to filter out in .procmailrc. The bad news is that this habit of > top posting and miserable quoting spreads like cancer and I have no > intention to cope with that anymore. Having to scroll down several > pages to find the content (if any) of a reply is equally annoying as > reading a top post with no context. A sufficently configurable MUA would allow you to define an alternate "delete with extreme prejudice" command, which would both summarily discard the item being read and send the author a canned message that said "Due to top posting and lack of trimming of quoted material, I was unable to find your actual point. Sorry your point has been discarded and lost". --==_Exmh_1318033604_9306P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOj5jEcC3lWbTT17ARAmsRAKCMeBiktwhpbM8TAWttvQvsok5tNACg1NRH DuEm2yfJgSP7bfZrWQOWFeA= =gjca -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1318033604_9306P--