linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux 11-minute mode (RTC update)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:06:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F5E194.5040409@free.fr> (raw)

(Message also posted to comp.protocols.time.ntp and linux-kernel but 
since timers are involved, I figured I might have more luck here.)

Hello,

I run Linux kernel 2.6.22.1-rt9 and ntpd 4.2.4p0

# adjtimex --print
          mode: 0
        offset: 77
     frequency: -1309904
      maxerror: 493576
      esterror: 50
        status: 1
time_constant: 6
     precision: 1
     tolerance: 33554432
          tick: 10000
      raw time:  1207230744s 183249us = 1207230744.183249

In my setup, STA_UNSYNC (0x0040, clock unsynchronized) is 0.

Thus, ntp_synced() returns 1.

Thus the kernel should write the system time to the RTC every
11 minutes; but it does not.

The relevant code is in sync_cmos_clock()

http://lxr.linux.no/linux/kernel/time/ntp.c#L188

I've added several printk() to this function, and it appears
that it is never called.

The relevant timer is defined with the following macro.

static DEFINE_TIMER(sync_cmos_timer, sync_cmos_clock, 0, 0);

which expands to

static struct timer_list sync_cmos_timer =
{
   .function = sync_cmos_clock,
   .expires  = 0,
   .data     = 0,
   .base     = &boot_tvec_bases
};

The problem seems to be that this timer is never armed, to bootstrap
the process. It seems there should be a call to mod_timer() somewhere.

do_adjtimex() calls notify_cmos_timer() unconditionally.

static void notify_cmos_timer(void)
{
   if (no_sync_cmos_clock)
     mod_timer(&sync_cmos_timer, jiffies + 1);
}

What are the semantics of notify_cmos_timer?
What is it supposed to do?

And what is 'no_sync_cmos_clock' supposed to mean?
/* Disable the cmos update - used by virtualization and embedded */
int no_sync_cmos_clock  __read_mostly;
Why would we (re)arm the timer when 'no_sync_cmos_clock' is true?

I'd be grateful for anyone sharing their knowledge.

Regards.


             reply	other threads:[~2008-04-04  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-04  8:06 John Sigler [this message]
2008-04-04  9:22 ` Linux 11-minute mode (RTC update) John Sigler
2008-04-05 17:54   ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-04 20:20 ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47F5E194.5040409@free.fr \
    --to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).