From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "K.R. Foley" Subject: Re: The best queue for RT_PREEMPT Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:40:11 -0500 Message-ID: <47F6922B.5080504@cybsft.com> References: <20080404184941.GA21013@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?TWF1cmljaW8g77+9?= Return-path: Received: from relay00.pair.com ([209.68.5.9]:3066 "HELO relay00.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751167AbYDDUqw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:46:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080404184941.GA21013@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mauricio =EF=BF=BD wrote: > Hi again, >=20 > I have some experience working on RTAI, and I am trying to do > something similar to a RT_FIFO. Which is the best method to have=20 > a FIFO queue between a real-time process and a non real-time process. > Maybe a pipe is enough, or msgget, or directly have a shared memory s= pace, > etc... Any comment will be very welcome! >=20 > Thanks! >=20 Why not use a FIFO implemented as a circular buffer in shared memory? --=20 kr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html