linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Joakim Hernberg" <jhernberg@alchemy.lu>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make HWLAT_DETECTOR kernel config either disabled or a module, never builtin.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:43:51 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <486903158.1453998.1450802631110.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56797B8F.6090008@linutronix.de>



----- Original Message -----
> On 12/22/2015 05:25 PM, John Kacur wrote:
> > The script can be made to handle it, that's not a big deal. I think the
> > historical
> > reason was worrying that people could be accidentally running a kernel with
> > some really heavy weight debugging that would affect performance. However,
> > let people
> > hang themselves if they want.
> 
> How can people hang themselves if they build it *into* the kernel? If I
> understand *how* this can happen I will try to address it. However from
> what I can see right now, nothing will happen if this module is built
> into the kernel.
> 
> > 
> > John
> > 
> Sebastian

All I mean is if you are accidentally running a debug kernel, you're going
to get really bad performance, which is obvious. However, why are you arguing
with me, I'm agreeing with and Clark is agreeing with you, let's make it possible
for people to enable it now, and forget whatever historical reason stopped us from
doing that before.

John

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-23 17:33 [PATCH] make HWLAT_DETECTOR kernel config either disabled or a module, never builtin Joakim Hernberg
2015-12-11 16:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-12-11 19:47   ` Joakim Hernberg
2015-12-13 10:39   ` Joakim Hernberg
2015-12-22 15:11     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-12-22 16:25       ` John Kacur
2015-12-22 16:34         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-12-22 16:43           ` John Kacur [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=486903158.1453998.1450802631110.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jhernberg@alchemy.lu \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).