From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: track next-highest priority (was "Series
 short discription")
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:39:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4936EE71.5010200@gmail.com>
References: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <4936E587.40700@gmail.com> <4936EC83.2060900@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>, mingo@elte.hu,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]:34035 "EHLO
	victor.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754878AbYLCUfl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:35:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4936EC83.2060900@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> BTW, it sure would be nice if the Subject: gave some idea of
> the, uh, subject of the patch series.
>
>   

Hi Randy,
  Indeed.  I fat-fingered that one on the original patch submission and
now it persists in the thread for all eternity for all who reply to the
original ;)

I have fixed it above.  Sorry for the confusion.

-Greg