From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grammostola Rosea Subject: Re: realtime kernel for Debian Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:28:14 +0200 Message-ID: <49CFBDBE.5020408@gmail.com> References: <200903242311.10783.nescivi@gmail.com> <49CA1781.3050603@gmail.com> <20090325131713.GH15865@ltw.loris.tv> <49CDFB4D.7070908@gmail.com> <49CF50D3.1080000@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, rt-users To: Debian Developers Return-path: Received: from smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net ([212.54.42.167]:55636 "EHLO smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbZC2ScL (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:32:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49CF50D3.1080000@gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Cassiel wrote: >> >>> debian stable aims to production servers, >> >> That's wrong. Debian stable aims at production systems. If your >> arguing would be true I wonder why stable contains applications like >> Openoffice.org or audio players or ... >> >>> IMO multimedia users can/should live with >>> testing without any fear of system crashes and security updates. >> >> I guess there are multimedia users out there who care much about a >> stable system, reproducible results and have to earn some money from >> their work - so they do not want to deal with unforseable changes. >> Please do not advertise testing as a release which is ready for >> users. (Yes, I admit I use testing in the way you describe - but >> *I* know what I'm doing.) >> >> > But is not that big problem to install two kernels? One, the default > Lenny kernel and an RT kernel from testing? > To get some progress here, I'm searching for a person who wants and is capable in filing a wishlist bug (with a patch vs. the package linux-2.6 thanks in advance, \r