From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grammostola Rosea Subject: Re: realtime kernel for Debian Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:01:33 +0200 Message-ID: <49CFC58D.4010803@gmail.com> References: <200903242311.10783.nescivi@gmail.com> <49CA1781.3050603@gmail.com> <20090325131713.GH15865@ltw.loris.tv> <49CDFB4D.7070908@gmail.com> <49CF50D3.1080000@gmail.com> <49CFBDBE.5020408@gmail.com> <20090329185525.GB25154@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Debian Developers , pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, rt-users To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090329185525.GB25154@pengutronix.de> Resent-Message-ID: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Hello, > > =20 >>>> I guess there are multimedia users out there who care much about a >>>> stable system, reproducible results and have to earn some money from >>>> their work - so they do not want to deal with unforseable changes. >>>> Please do not advertise testing as a release which is ready for >>>> users. (Yes, I admit I use testing in the way you describe - but >>>> *I* know what I'm doing.) >>>> >>>> >>>> =20 >>> But is not that big problem to install two kernels? One, the default = =20 >>> Lenny kernel and an RT kernel from testing? >>> >>> =20 >> To get some progress here, I'm searching for a person who wants and is= =20 >> capable in filing a wishlist bug (with a patch vs. the package linux-2= .6 >> =20 > Maybe providing a patch package is a better first step? > =20 thanks for thinking. Who could provide such a patch package? \r --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian= .org