linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Al Dorrington <albert.dorrington@lmco.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fedora 10 as basis for RT?
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:38:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DE4ED1.7030509@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090409T134400-381@post.gmane.org>

Al Dorrington wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am working on a proof of concept project where we are going to try moving an
> application that runs on VxWorks to Linux. I believe with what I've read on this
> mailing list, and the RTwiki site that Linux is definitely up to the task with
> these kernel patches.
> 
> However, I am not really sure which distribution of Linux we should use as the
> base, nor am I sure if it would be better to stick with the 'i386' distribution
> or go with the x86_64 variant.
> 
> I am considering Fedora 10, either i386 or x86_64. 
> 
> Does anyone have any comments or recommendations for which might be better to
> use, or if we would be better off using another distribution?

As far as the distro goes, the one caveat used to be making sure you had 
one with a recent enough glibc so you could take advantage of Priority 
Inheritance with the pthread mutexes and such.  That's pretty much no 
longer an issue, but FC10 does ship glibc2.9 which has the advantage of 
using PROCESS_PRIVATE futexes by default, which should give you slightly 
better performance in some situations.

-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-09 13:49 Fedora 10 as basis for RT? Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 14:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-04-09 14:45 ` Mark Knecht
2009-04-09 15:12   ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 18:06 ` Clark Williams
2009-04-09 19:38 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-04-10 17:28 ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-10 18:21   ` Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DE4ED1.7030509@us.ibm.com \
    --to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=albert.dorrington@lmco.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).