From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP RT Tests (Cyclic, rt-migrate, etc) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:10:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4A71FE38.20501@us.ibm.com> References: <1224509719.5152.116.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1246890698.4887.24.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247076833.5405.48.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <200907102200.12804.sripathik@in.ibm.com> <1247244446.5040.0.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4A57884C.10401@us.ibm.com> <4A64A369.8040808@us.ibm.com> <1248978525.5788.55.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4A71F964.1060507@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subrata Modak , Sripathi Kodi , Gowrishankar , ltp-list , linux-rt-users , Gregory Haskins , Clark Williams To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:50883 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387AbZG3UKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:36 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6UKAFYZ017250 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:15 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n6UKAaoa255082 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:36 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6UKAYtT017745 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Darren Hart wrote: >> Just to be clear, Steven you want us to modify this test case so that it uses >> the librttest facilities, including those for standardized argument parsing, >> buffered out, and thread creation, then commit this to the repository? I >> don't feel it should go in without those changes. We've expended a lot of >> effort making the tests in ltp/realtime be consistent in those areas (they all >> use some common command line arguments and coding styles). This ensures that >> they can be easily maintained along with the other tests in the suite and that >> users can know what to expect from the test in terms of output, etc. > > The test is GPL, do what you want ;-) > > I have my own version that I may play with, but I have no qualms about > changing the interface. Especially if it is to be consistent with the rest > of LTP. But please CC me on any changes. I can tell if the changes modify > the the way the test works, or I may want to incorporate the changes into > my local copy. OK, will do. -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Real-Time Linux Team