From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel James Subject: Re: preempt rt in commercial use Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:04:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4C8F72C9.2060104@64studio.com> References: <201009141317.13439@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> <20100914094411.GB10841@pengutronix.de> <4C8F67A6.1030409@steinhoff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-rt-users To: Armin Steinhoff Return-path: Received: from rom012.server4you.de ([62.75.222.127]:35903 "EHLO rom012.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752889Ab0INNOU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:14:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C8F67A6.1030409@steinhoff.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Armin, > Hm, and what do think about that statement from FSMLabs: >=20 > "Linux =93PREEMPT=94 real-time is a continuing experiment aimed at au= dio > and video playing with unreliable results and a detrimental affect on > =93enterprise=94 performance" I believe that quote comes from a sales pitch for RTLinux: http://www.yodaiken.com/papers/preempt.pdf In that context, it's hardly likely to be objective criticism :-) Cheers! Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html