From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Subject: Re: 2.6.35 + rt? Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:35:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4CB5EDED.10100@localhost> References: <4CB3A520.9040300@ccrma.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Return-path: Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU ([171.67.219.82]:39979 "EHLO smtp.stanford.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752277Ab0JMRfp (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:35:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B67A1708E1 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm-mail.stanford.edu (cm-mail.Stanford.EDU [171.64.197.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063D41708E9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB3A520.9040300@ccrma.stanford.edu> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/11/2010 05:00 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Any news on the above combination? I can test if there is something > available... Hmmm, looks like the git repo is tracking 2.6.36 up to rc7. I presume that is going to be the next "oficial" rt patch (instead of 2.6.35). Is it usable at this point? Should I try to test? Should I wait? -- Fernando