From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35 + rt?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:33:26 -0700
Message-ID: <4CB76916.5000902@am.sony.com>
References: <4CB3A520.9040300@ccrma.stanford.edu> <4CB5EDED.10100@localhost>
Reply-To: <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from am1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.206]:41883
	"EHLO AM1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755238Ab0JNUeQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:34:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4CB5EDED.10100@localhost>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>

On 10/13/10 10:35, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 05:00 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>> Any news on the above combination? I can test if there is something
>> available...
> 
> Hmmm, looks like the git repo is tracking 2.6.36 up to rc7. I presume

Which branch of which repo is that?

> that is going to be the next "oficial" rt patch (instead of 2.6.35). Is 
> it usable at this point? Should I try to test? Should I wait?

Thanks!

-Frank