From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: 2.6.35 + rt? Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:02:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4CB77DE3.40904@am.sony.com> References: <4CB3A520.9040300@ccrma.stanford.edu> <4CB5EDED.10100@localhost> <4CB76916.5000902@am.sony.com> <4CB77122.40408@localhost> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Return-path: Received: from tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.11]:24000 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932266Ab0JNWCs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:02:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CB77122.40408@localhost> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/14/10 14:07, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On 10/14/2010 01:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 10/13/10 10:35, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >>> On 10/11/2010 05:00 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >>>> Any news on the above combination? I can test if there is something >>>> available... >>> Hmmm, looks like the git repo is tracking 2.6.36 up to rc7. I presume >> Which branch of which repo is that? > > From here: > https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Download > > I go to: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=summary OK, branch master is 2.6.37-rc7 (according to Makefile), but the various rt branches that I looked at are not. Branch master does not appear to contain the RT patches. There are a lot of different rt branches, and I did not look at all of them, but I looked at several obvious possibilities. As of the 2.6.22-rt3 announcement, branch rt/head was going to follow the linus tree but is currently 2.6.33-rt (according to Makefile), and was last modified March 3. Branch rt/2.6.33 is currently 2.6.33.7.1-rt29, last modified Sept 16. The other rt branches I looked at are older. So it looks to me like the latest RT development in git is currently at 2.6.33.7 plus a few changes. Am I understanding this correctly? Thanks, Frank