From: "Niccolò Belli" <darkbasic4@gmail.com>
To: Robin Gareus <robin@gareus.org>
Cc: Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
"linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com>,
Free Ekanayaka <free.ekanayaka@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:20:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF13DC0.8080109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEDAE00.1050800@gareus.org>
Il 25/11/2010 01:29, Robin Gareus ha scritto:
> Don't worry. It's not worth the hype it generated. I'm just back from
> rolling a new kernel for 64studio. I tried a couple of candidates
> including -bfs.
>
> 2.6.33.7-rt29 is _by far_ the best option for low-latency audio.
> Well, actually it's the only option (not counting older rt-linux
> releases) which provides reliable <=4 ms latency (16 or 32 audio-frames
> per period) without any x-runs!
I agree: I patched alsa git to make it compile but I didn't notice any
major improvement with -bfs :-(
I hope the next -rt kernel will be released soon, otherwise I fear I
will crash my laptop next time I hear "what about buying a Mac?" .-.
Darkbasic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-27 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 19:36 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1? Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2010-11-10 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-11 14:56 ` Niccolò Belli
2010-11-11 22:49 ` Ng Oon-Ee
2010-11-11 23:44 ` Bernardo Barros
2010-11-12 0:05 ` jordan
2010-11-19 21:18 ` Niccolò Belli
2010-11-25 0:29 ` Robin Gareus
2010-11-27 17:20 ` Niccolò Belli [this message]
2010-11-25 0:29 ` Robin Gareus
2010-11-25 11:25 ` Niccolò Belli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF13DC0.8080109@gmail.com \
--to=darkbasic4@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@64studio.com \
--cc=free.ekanayaka@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=ngoonee@gmail.com \
--cc=robin@gareus.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).