From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Borgmann Subject: Re: patchset still being developed? Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4D023C84.8030201@googlemail.com> References: <4D022981.20606@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:55020 "EHLO mail-ew0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042Ab0LJOnU (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:43:20 -0500 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so2570020ewy.4 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:43:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D022981.20606@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I just installed 2.6.36.2, but it doesn't seem to have complete preemption. I don't see the IRQs as processes and cannot set priorities to them. Therefore 2.6.33.7 seems to be the last kernel with rt-support. Am I right? Of so, why? Dennis Dennis Borgmann schrieb: > Hello rt-users! > > Is the CONFIG PREEMPT RT Patch still developed? So far I canot find any > newer patchset than the one for kernel 2.6.33.7 on > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/ but what I can find > is submissions to the linux kernel related to PREEMPT stuff in the > Changelog of recent kernels. > > Does this mean, that with current kernels (starting 2.6.34) no more > patching is needed and a Kernel can be configured to do realtime > preemption without patches? > > If so, an update on the mainpage of the wiki would be nice... > > Kind regards, > Dennis >