From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@autostatic.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 2.6.33.9-rt31
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:42:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4DA6A549.2000100@autostatic.com>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1104111723020.4501@localhost6.localdomain6>	<497D1168CB2F407F9005845B39FEF144@e1705>	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1104111806021.4501@localhost6.localdomain6>	<BANLkTi=6UnfiOwwdwgJvW0kZyJ7OoE0dpg@mail.gmail.com>	<4DA32E16.8090807@osadl.org>	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1104111846140.6190@localhost6.localdomain6>	<369290E6B58D4A3BAC211B6A4BB73E0B@e1705>	<BANLkTinKyw0d56USqVwJgVCsehpyVdMHVw@mail.gmail.com>	<4DA5F178.4080705@autostatic.com>	<4DA633DC.8060800@gmail.com>	<4DA69C1F.8010908@autostatic.com> <BANLkTi=OpNAnBhc5zxjsk6ehuv9TMxVbPA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from paard.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.182]:43363 "EHLO paard.ic.uva.nl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753545Ab1DNHmD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:42:03 -0400
Received: from [146.50.80.232] (pch080232.hum.uva.nl [146.50.80.232])
	by paard.ic.uva.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p3E7g1th024967
	for <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:42:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=OpNAnBhc5zxjsk6ehuv9TMxVbPA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/14/2011 09:26 AM, jordan wrote:
> From your own experience, how well does it perform??

Hello Jordan,

To be honest, I don't have the faintest clue. Just passing the message.

Best,

Jeremy