linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@cfl.rr.com>
To: Pedro Gonnet <gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 16:48:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD82514.3070407@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305886116.10494.30.camel@laika>

On 05/20/2011 06:08 AM, Pedro Gonnet wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm currently working on a shared-memory parallel Molecular Dynamics
> simulation library (http://mdcore.sourceforge.net/) geared towards
> multi-core systems.
>
> The library uses pthreads (plus some OpenMP for some simple loops) and
> uses pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_signal to coordinate a group of
> worker threads.
>
> I've been profiling the library on different machines and kernels and
> have noticed that in many cases there are significant (several ms,
> measured with Intel's Vtune-thing) lags between calls to
> pthread_cond_signal and the waiting thread actually getting back to
> work.
>
> I've tried the Ubuntu -rt and -preempt kernels, and the whole simulation
> runs twice as slowly, despite following the advice given here:
>
>          https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/HOWTO:_Build_an_RT-application
>
> My question is the following: which kernel (or set of configuration
> options) will minimize these latencies? And if linux-rt is the answer,
> in what ways do I have to be careful when porting the simulation for
> this kernel?
>

Are you saying several ms latency from pthread_cond_signal to waking up a 
thread in pthread_cond_wait?

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 10:08 Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-21 20:48 ` Mark Hounschell [this message]
2011-05-21 20:51   ` Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-21 21:40     ` Rolando Martins
2011-05-22  0:44     ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 11:34       ` Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 13:51         ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 18:37 ` Robert Schwebel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-20 11:15 Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 14:53 ` Armin Steinhoff
2011-05-22 15:18   ` Armin Steinhoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD82514.3070407@cfl.rr.com \
    --to=dmarkh@cfl.rr.com \
    --cc=gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).