Re: [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time

[Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>]

On 05/25/12 16:39, John Kacur wrote:
> This is a preliminary hack, I need to clean it up a little, but incase you
> want to give it a try, here is the alpha version.
> 
> Note - I stole this methodology from tools/perf
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>

I knew I would regret suggesting this fix.

It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for native build.

It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for crossbuild for ARM.

The NUMA=0 option is still useful (thank you for leaving that
in place).  I have a second ARM target board, where the cross
linker does not complain about libnuma, so cyclictest is
build with libnuma.  But my run time environment does not have
a libnuma.  Ah the joy of pre-release file systems.  The NUMA=0
option allowed me to properly build cyclictest to run on this
not quite yet finished file system.

Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>

-Frank