From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: [PATCH RT-TESTS 0/3] A few Makefile clean-ups Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:07:42 -0800 Message-ID: <5115853E.8050004@am.sony.com> References: <1360334855-10176-1-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Clark Williams , "Rowand, Frank" , rt-users To: John Kacur Return-path: Received: from co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.27]:32653 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1947161Ab3BHXHf (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:07:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1360334855-10176-1-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/08/13 06:47, John Kacur wrote: > From: John Kacur > > I have few simple build clean-ups, which should be uncontroversial > for the rt-tests suite > > John Kacur (3): > Makefile: Don't tag tmp files created when making a release > Makefile: Add tmp dir to distclean and "make release" call distclean > Makefile: Add BUILDROOT and SPECS to the dirs to remove for distclean > > Makefile | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > All three patches: Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand Tested-by: Frank Rowand With the caveat that "make rpm" does not complete on my build system due to a missing numactl-devel dependency. Even without "make rpm" completing, it creates the extra objects that patch 3 removes, so I think my testing is still valid. -Frank