From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislav Meduna Subject: Re: e1000e 82574L transmit latency? Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:49:45 +0200 Message-ID: <51A4B5F9.6010206@meduna.org> References: <51A4A6F7.5090909@meduna.org> <20130528150135.41a6d6fb@sth491dt.servo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: =?UTF-8?B?TmVib2rFoWEgxIZvc2nEhw==?= Return-path: Received: from www.meduna.org ([92.240.244.38]:42936 "EHLO meduna.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933785Ab3E1Nty (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 09:49:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130528150135.41a6d6fb@sth491dt.servo.net> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28.05.2013 15:01, Neboj=C5=A1a =C4=86osi=C4=87 wrote: > If you are having several processes/threads with different priorities > sending on same eth, combined with high cpu load on RT processes, tha= n > it sounds a lot like a problem I had: Check > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.rt.user/10163 for details Hm, interesting. However, there is just one thread sending on the interface and all threads with higher priority generally only run for brief intervals and do not do anything with ethernet. There are lower-prio threads doing full TCP/IP but they communivate on another interface (also a e100e one). Thanks --=20 Stano -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html