From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v2] kvm: don't try to take mmu_lock while holding the main raw kvm_lock Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <51CB644C.1090305@redhat.com> References: <51CAA1DE.2020307@redhat.com> <1372270295-16496-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:59786 "EHLO mail-ee0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752014Ab3FZV7s (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:59:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1372270295-16496-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 26/06/2013 20:11, Paul Gortmaker ha scritto: > spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > + kvm_put_kvm(kvm); > srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); > kvm_put_kvm needs to go last. I can fix when applying, but I'll wait for Gleb to take a look too. Paolo