From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:34:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5212B9A8.9050900@ccrma.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home>
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
>
>
>>> The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
>>> just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
>>> definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the
>>> right way to do it.
>>> So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack?
>
> I think I'm going to send them an email about that.
>
>>
>> In the meanwhile, any hope of a patch to be able to compile and test
>> with my current configuration?
>
> Can you boot without enabling CONFIG_BCACHE?
I'm pretty sure I'll be able to do that. No real need in my personal
case AFAICT.
I'll try that next - it is just that I try very hard to keep the
configuration of my rt kernels as close as possible to the defaults that
Fedora uses (they get distributed as part of Planet CCRMA and there is
no telling what usage cases they will hit - it would be confusing to
have something that works on Fedora kernels and does not on equivalent
RT patched kernels).
Thanks for the heads up!,
-- Fernando
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-20 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 16:34 [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-12 19:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-13 0:47 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-13 1:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-13 1:12 ` Carsten Emde
2013-08-13 10:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-13 12:08 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <CAF+KLxsGtt_+0shjSGbjC4MG7i_yg1NL1zUXuVb-RiN=C44_nA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-14 18:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-14 18:21 ` Staffan Tjernstrom
2013-08-15 18:42 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2013-08-15 19:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-15 19:39 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2013-08-16 7:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-19 17:23 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2013-08-20 0:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-20 0:34 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [this message]
2013-08-20 1:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-20 7:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-20 14:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-20 18:58 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
[not found] ` <CAFfPn7iqf5EntPKdRO3cFhd=PFostp3mVLGEtt3ksLQHonMhkw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-27 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5212B9A8.9050900@ccrma.stanford.edu \
--to=nando@ccrma.stanford.edu \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).