From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:58:13 -0700
Message-ID: <5213BC45.6020900@localhost>
References: <20130812163413.GI23040@linutronix.de> <520D212F.7030400@localhost> <20130815152210.5ed93696@gandalf.local.home> <520DCE5F.1040402@linutronix.de> <521254A0.6050603@localhost> <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
>
>>> The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
>>> just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
>>> definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the
>>> right way to do it.
>>> So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack?
>
> I think I'm going to send them an email about that.
>
>> In the meanwhile, any hope of a patch to be able to compile and test
>> with my current configuration?
>
> Can you boot without enabling CONFIG_BCACHE?

Just to confirm that the kernel builds, installs and boots fine without 
this option...
-- Fernando