From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtmutex: take the waiter lock with irqs off Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:33:46 -0500 Message-ID: <5293980A.4030804@windriver.com> References: <1383798668.5441.25.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131107125923.GB24644@localhost.localdomain> <1384243595.15180.63.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131115163008.GB12164@linutronix.de> <20131115201436.GC12164@linutronix.de> <20131118141021.GA10022@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131122135931.GA8698@linutronix.de> <20131122160841.GS3866@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Mike Galbraith , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , RT , "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131122160841.GS3866@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On 13-11-22 11:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:59:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> +extern void __lockfunc rt_spin_try_unlock(spinlock_t *lock); > > I know what you mean, but.. try_unlock() just sounds wrong, how can we > attempt but fail to unlock a lock we hold ;-) rt-v3.10-devel$git grep -l tryunlock tasklet-rt-prevent-tasklets-from-going-into-infinite-spin-in-rt.patch rt-v3.10-devel$ > > > /me crawls back under his rock ;-) Can you take tasklets with you? ;-)