From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.4-rt] backport of completion-use-simple-wait-queues.patch
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:11:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5298AE91.6010309@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131129124931.GA31099@linutronix.de>
On 13-11-29 07:49 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Paul Gortmaker | 2013-11-28 15:10:29 [-0500]:
>
>> Hi Steve,
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Someone tripped over this with usb console:
>>
>> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 36, name: kworker/1:1
>> Pid: 36, comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G O 3.4.34-rt40_preempt-rt #1
>> Call Trace:
>> [<c105461e>] __might_sleep+0xce/0xf0
>> [<c14fe24c>] rt_spin_lock+0x1c/0x40
>> [<c1056f65>] complete+0x25/0x60
>> [<c14fde10>] ? rt_mutex_lock+0x20/0x50
>> [<c135e1b0>] usb_stor_blocking_completion+0x10/0x20
>> [<c13317b7>] usb_poll_irq_flush_helper+0x67/0xf0
>> [<c1056ad4>] ? migrate_enable+0x74/0x170
>> [<c10427f7>] process_one_work+0x107/0x410
>
> git grep usb_poll_irq_flush_helper
> shows no results in 3.4.61-rt77 and 3.6.11.9-rt42.
Ah right, my bad. The original report was on a tree that had Jason
Wessel's polling patches applied:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/5/195
I didn't immediately clue in that they weren't mainline, and since
I wasn't able to reproduce the breakage locally, well...
Thanks for spotting that. I guess the completion patch wouldn't hurt
to be in 3.4-rt anyway, but it is more a feature than a fix, it now seems.
[Not sure if Steve is still adding to the v3.4-rt-features branch...]
> The function seems to disable interrups and it completes a usb-storage
> request. This would works on mainline but in -RT those things run in thread
> context (usb-hcd-use-local-irq-nort.patch).
>
> Depending on what urbs you complete via usb_poll_irq_flush_helper() you
> could deadlock if the urb-complete handler grabs a lock.
I think the sane thing here is for me to tell them to go with the
idea of disabling the usb polling for RT, just like we do for
netpoll/netconsole already in vanilla-rt.
Thanks again for the feedback,
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-29 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 20:10 [3.4-rt] backport of completion-use-simple-wait-queues.patch Paul Gortmaker
2013-11-29 12:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-29 15:11 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-11-29 22:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-29 23:29 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5298AE91.6010309@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).