From: Rolf Peukert <rolf.peukert@imms.de>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D92990.1020904@imms.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140116015824.201732155@goodmis.org>
On 16.01.2014 02:58, Steven Rostedt wrote:
...
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
>
Hi Steven,
i just tried the incremental patch on our kernel and it applied without
problems. But when I try to build it with only "Basic RT" configured, I
get this error message:
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'invoke_softirq':
kernel/softirq.c:626:2: error: 'else' without a previous 'if'
The source code before that line currently looks like this
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
if (!force_irqthreads)
lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq();
__do_softirq();
else {
Is one of the lines in the wrong place or is it just missing brackets?
Best regards
Rolf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 1:58 [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] cpu_down: move migrate_enable() back Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] swait: Add a few more users Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 3/8] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit() Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] rtmutex: use a trylock for waiter lock in trylock Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 3:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-17 4:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-17 5:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-31 22:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-02-01 4:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-01 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 5/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask() function Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 9:41 ` [PATCH RT 0/8] " Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 14:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 14:36 ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 15:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 17:19 ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 16:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-17 13:01 ` Rolf Peukert [this message]
2014-01-17 13:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-17 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D92990.1020904@imms.de \
--to=rolf.peukert@imms.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).